BCS Director Bill Hancock says BCS Commissioners are Split on Playoff Format, Thinks Eight-Team Playoff is Unlikely

May 10, 2012 – 7:40 am by Brad Gagnon

As executive director of the BCS, Bill Hancock has been involved in some rather contentious and heated radio conversations over the years. But as the BCS commissioners work toward finally establishing something that resembles a playoff in college football, Hancock’s radio interviews are becoming much more upbeat and civil.

Much is to be determined, but we appear to be on the brink of peace in the world of college football.

BCS executive director Bill Hancock joined Chris McClain and Jim Celania on The Mac Attack on WFNZ in Charlotte to discuss the time frame for finalizing a new college football playoff format, what said format might look like and the potential for home playoff games.

On the time frame for finalizing a playoff format:

“Well it’s always good and helpful to talk about the time frame, and first of all there’s still two more years to go on the current agreement. But the rest of the time frame is: during the next couple of months the conferences will be talking about the future and I hope by early summer we will be able to announce a change in the BCS.”

On what the format might look like:

“It’s a very interesting question. And when the commissioners elected to present this four-team playoff concept to the conferences, they intentionally didn’t resolve that as well as where to play the games and how the teams are selected. And I’ll be curious at the end of this to see what your listeners are thinking about it. But generally, there’s up sides and down sides to everything. Obviously if you have 1, 2, 3 and 4, you’ve got a pure bracket: 1 versus 4 and 2 versus 3. But if you take the conference champions — the top four ranked conference champions — then the regular season, which is the best in sports anyway, may mean even more. But then you would have a question about, ‘Well, what about No. 2 Alabama?’ This year, if it had been the conference champions, it would’ve been teams ranked 1, 3, 5 and 10. And is that what the public wants to see? I really don’t know. From what I’ve heard, folks are about divided 50/50 on it.”

On schools potentially having the ability to play home games in the playoff:

“There’s still a long way to go in our conversations, so we’re not to the end of the game yet and that certainly is one of the things that is still on the table. I was director of the Final Four before I went to work in football and we experienced it in basketball back in the eighties. Which was too much of a home-court advantage in basketball, and so we went away from it in basketball. And I don’t know what the response will be in football after awhile. Will people decide that the 1 and 2 teams have earned too much of an advantage? I dunno. And another thing is the infrastructure on campuses may leave something to be desired. And would you have the celebratory pageantry of a postseason event on campus?  That’s an unknown. But of course one of the advantages to campus play is you’re assured of a huge crowd of enthusiastic fans. And another one is, if you’re dealing with semifinals and a championship, then if the home team wins of course then their fans have not had to travel across the country two different weeks, a week apart, to go to these games.”

On who is involved in this decision and where they’re leaning:

“There’s 11 conference commissioners and the Notre Dame AD. That’s basically the board that runs the BCS. And I wouldn’t hazard a guess as to where they are on this. They haven’t come to a final conclusion. But they’re split. It’s safe to say that — they’re split. … The commissioners will collaboratively come to some agreement about what the format should be. There won’t be a vote — they will just sit and talk it through until they come up with something that everybody can live with.”

On the likelihood that this is a stepping stone to an eight-team postseason:

“I don’t think it’s likely. I don’t wanna speak for the next 30 years, but I don’t think it’s likely.”

Listen to Bill Hancock on WFNZ here

Tags: , ,

  1. 2 Responses to “BCS Director Bill Hancock says BCS Commissioners are Split on Playoff Format, Thinks Eight-Team Playoff is Unlikely”

  2. I find the whole subject of having two teams from one conference in the National playoffs absurd.

    The only consideration should be having the best team as National Champion. The BCS should adopt the position that they do not have the time or resources to create a true competition tournament that allows for more than 1 team per conference to participate. The conferences should determine who the best team in the conference is and place that team in the National Playoff. If you don’t win your conference you go home.

    I don’t care if the TOP 10 is all from the SEC, only one SEC team can be crowned National Champion so win your conference or shut up.

    Notre Dame be damned if they want to play for the Championship, join a conference like everyone else.

    Either give us a 16 team playoff with all conference Champions or give us the Top 6 Champions only. Top 2 get a first round bye and home field advantage for the semi-final. #3 and #4 get home field advantage for 1st round vs #5 and #6.

    This format will virtually guarantee that SEC, Big 10, Big 12 and Pac 12 are in the Playoff leaving the possibility that the final 2 seeds will be selected from Big East, ACC, MWC or CUSA.

    If games are won by higher seeds as one would expect 5 and 6 would have one road game, 3 and 4 would have one home game and then one road game, 1 and 2 would have 1 home game and then travel to the National Championship Game that should be bid out like the Super Bowl. Rose, Fiesta, Sugar and Orange can go back to life without the BCS.

    No 2nd team from the same conference, No Independents.

    By Gray Grantham on May 10, 2012

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. May 11, 2012: Bill Hancock’s “jes’ folks” | Get The Picture

Post a Comment